Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6030 MSN Practicum and Capstone
Prof. Name
Date
Problem Statement (PICOT)
Hand hygiene (HH) is considered as vital for avoiding and controlling healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and the transmission of drug resistant bacteria. However, inconsistent and inadequate HH practices among staff continue to pose risks, increasing infection rates and healthcare costs. HH involves the proper exercise of cleansing by staff to prevent contamination. Over the past decade, efforts to improve HH have increased due to a growing number of elderly patients and the push to reduce hospital stays.
In 2018, the United States (U.S) spent $102.3 billion on health services, 30% more than five years earlier (McDonald et al., 2020). At Benedictine Healthcare, improving HH compliance reduces preventable HAIs and enhances care quality. This project promotes proper sanitation practices among staff through education and monitoring. The project employs the PICOT outline to generate current approaches to expand compliance and reduce HAIs complications.
PICO(T) Question
“In healthcare staff employed in acute care settings (P), does the execution of organized HH education (I), compared to standard HH practices without focused training (C), improve HH compliance rates (O) over four weeks (T)?”
- Population (P): Healthcare staff in an acute care setting
- Intervention (I): Execution of organized HH education
- Comparison (C): Standard HH practices without focused training
- Outcome (O): Improved HH compliance rates
- Time (T): Over four weeks
Problem Statement
Needs Assessment
This plan focuses on improving HH compliance among Benedictine Healthcare staff by implementing structured HH education. Improving HH practices is critical. Inadequate compliance contributes to spreading HAIs, compromises patient safety, and increases healthcare costs. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), one in three facilities does not have HH at the point of care, and compliance is just 9% during serious healthcare in developing nations. In developed countries, HH obedience exceeds 70%. It underscores the global need for improvement (WHO, 2021). Ineffective HH is one of the leading causes of these infections.
Despite existing protocols, many healthcare workers lack consistent adherence due to training, awareness, and reinforcement gaps. Structured educational programs that include practical training, visual reminders, and constant feedback have improved HH behavior. Research highlights that targeted education positively affects compliance rates, reduces infection risks, and enhances patient outcomes (Deryabina et al., 2021). The strategy’s effectiveness relies on staff participation and leadership support to foster a culture of accountability and safety. This project uses four weeks of structured HH education to reduce infections and improve care quality.
Population and Settings
This project focuses on improving HH obedience among workers at Benedictine Healthcare to reduce the incidence of HAIs. Staff noncompliance with HH protocols is a persistent issue that compromises patient safety and contributes to infection transmission. Poor HH remains among the most significant contributors to HAIs in healthcare settings. Study findings revealed that while most hospitals had tools to promote HH, only 46% displayed them at all HH stations, and just 10% used methods to improve team communication. Managerial support was reported in 56% of hospitals for HH and 51% for injection safety (Deryabina et al., 2021).
Many healthcare workers fall short despite established guidelines due to inconsistent training, lack of reminders, and limited accountability. Research shows structured intervention education positively affects staff behavior and increases HH adherence (McDonald et al., 2020). The current HH practices at Benedictine Healthcare lack focused training and continuous reinforcement, limiting their efficiency. Executing a structured education program aims to address these gaps by enhancing knowledge, understanding, and developing a value of safety. Improving adherence will impact infection prevention efforts. It optimizes resource utilization and elevates the quality of care.
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)
The project will be conducted within Benedictine Healthcare and focus on improving staff HH practices. This setting is ideal for implementing real-time, evidence-based approaches to decrease the hazard of HAIs. The project centers on introducing structured HH education to promote consistent and effective practices. This intervention includes staff training, practical demonstrations, visual reminders, and compliance monitoring (Assefa et al., 2021). The initiative aims to improve staff awareness and adherence to enhance patient safety, reduce infection transmission, and support a culture of accountability. This approach strengthens care quality while decreasing HAIs, costs, and complications within the facility.
Intervention Overview
A formal training program on HH will be given to staff members at Benedictine Healthcare. Participants in the program receive training, see reminders, and are monitored for HH to help improve their practice (Assefa et al., 2021). The commitment of the plan is to help healthcare workers whose poor HH leads to HAIs. Its goals are to increase staff understanding, encourage regular adherence to rules and decrease infection. It works to improve HH by supplying education and ongoing help. Following proper HH rules lowers the risk of infection for patients. It reduces problems caused by infections and lowers the pressure on healthcare services (Assadian et al., 2021).
In Benedictine Healthcare’s clinical setting, healthcare staff are important for preventing infections and ensuring patient safety. Providing planned HH education helps staff remember the best ways to clean their hands. As a result, workers maintain compliance and the workplace becomes safer (Assadian et al., 2021). The Collaborative Care Model team is responsible for the patient’s care.
It encourages everyone to speak openly and protects each person. It improves how models follow good hygiene habits (Adams et al., 2023). Still, for the plan to work, there must be enough trained educators, ongoing monitoring and support from leaders, which can be difficult for current work processes. It is difficult to maintain staff members’ involvement and stick to proper HH (Lowe et al., 2021). Despite these difficulties, this strategy improves how well patients follow their plans, cuts down HAIs, saves money and helps patients recover more successfully at Benedictine Healthcare.
Comparison of Approaches
A different way to teach HH is by having digital reminders and monitoring systems. Electronic alerts, mobile applications and immediate feedback are used in this intervention to motivate healthcare workers to clean their hands (Blomgren et al., 2021). With help from digital tools, people are reminded regularly to keep learning and are tracked to see if they are following the plan. This way of working supports staff who are not all together in the same place or at the same time. It makes it simpler and easier to keep your hands clean. The purpose is to encourage compliance by using technology in your everyday actions.
On the other hand, some staff choose in-person training and feel that digital tools are not as effective. A lack of devices, reluctance to use technology, or insufficient IT support can make it harder for education to succeed. Using digital monitoring requires spending money and keeping the system maintained (Lowe et al., 2021). Even with these problems, digital solutions and traditional education can increase HH, cut down on infections and ensure better patient safety at Benedictine Healthcare.
Initial Outcome Draft
This program aims to help Benedictine Healthcare staff improve their hygiene habits with proper HH education. The purpose is to boost infection prevention by informing staff, giving reminders and checking how often they comply. Strong HH adherence can help prevent HAIs and protect patients. More compliance means there is less chance of pathogens being transmitted. It reduces the number of infections and the costs related to healthcare (van Roekel et al., 2021). Proper HH makes health care safer, work more smoothly and use resources effectively.
The program’s success will be measured by how many people follow the protocols, how often HAIs occur and how much information staff members remember. The impact of the intervention will be calculated using observations of HH, infection surveillance information and comments from staff. The approach helps ensure better patient care by making the workplace safer and encouraging various health professionals to work together. Educating staff about HH using organized methods improves the management of infections and benefits patients and staff.
Quality Improvement Model
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) outline provides a structured method to improve HH practices among Benedictine Healthcare staff. This project uses the PDSA cycle to lead the development, execution, evaluation, and refinement of an HH education and monitoring program (Kumar et al., 2022). In the “Plan” stage, the team designs the intervention by developing educational materials, setting compliance goals, and organizing reminder systems.
The “Do” phase involves delivering HH training. It places visual cues throughout the facility and facilitates compliance monitoring among healthcare staff. During the “Study” phase, HH adherence rates and HAIs incidences are collected and analyzed to evaluate the program’s efficiency. Finally, the “Act” phase changes are made based on data insights, staff feedback, and observed challenges to improve training methods and compliance strategies. It ensures sustained improvements in HH and patient safety.
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)
Implementing the HH improvement program faces challenges such as varying levels of staff compliance, differences in knowledge about infection control, workload pressures, and occasional shortages of HH supplies. Communication barriers related to language diversity and cultural differences among staff affect the consistent delivery of education and reminders. Providing personalized training, using clear and culturally sensitive communication tools, and fostering strong teamwork and interprofessional collaboration is vital. In spite of these challenges, the flexible description of the PDSA cycle supports constant changes and improvements (Kumar et al., 2022). This iterative process helps optimize HH compliance, reduce HAIs and enhance patient safety at Benedictine Healthcare.
Time Estimate
Implementing this scheme to enhance HH compliance among Benedictine Healthcare staff will extent four weeks and be distributed into two main stages: planning and staff education (first two weeks) and full-scale execution with monitoring and feedback (following two weeks).
Planning and Staff Education Phase (First Two Weeks):
In the first four days, evaluate current HH practices, staff compliance rates, and hygiene supply availability. Recognize blockades, such as knowledge gaps or workflow challenges. It affects HH among Benedictine Healthcare staff.In the next five days, develop targeted educational materials and HH rules. These include training modules, reminder systems, and compliance monitoring tools. Execution plans must be finalized, and approvals from leadership and infection control teams must be secured.In the last five days, we have delivered staff-structured HH education and training, introduced reminder cues and monitoring processes, and piloted the intervention in select departments to collect feedback and adjust strategies for broader rollout.
Execution Phase (Last Two Weeks):
Launch the structured HH education program across Benedictine Healthcare in the first four days. Begin delivering targeted training sessions, distributing educational materials, and executing visual reminders and compliance tracking tools for staff.In the next 5 days, monitor HH compliance rates and staff engagement. Identify and address barriers such as knowledge gaps, workflow disruptions, or supply issues in real time, adjusting educational content and support strategies as desired.In the last 5 days, assess results in contradiction of important standards like HH compliance rates and reduction in HAIs incidents. Collect conclusions into a detailed statement to evaluate the intervention’s efficiency and inform plans for wider execution.
Expected obstacles to the schedule comprise variability in staff engagement with HH education, possible personnel shortages to support training sessions, and resistance to changing established hygiene practices. Moreover, ensuring consistent availability of HH supplies and integrating compliance monitoring tools present challenges. Maintaining proactive oversight and addressing these issues will keep the project on track within four weeks.
Literature Review
Numerous studies emphasize the need to enhance HH adherence among medical staff to decrease HAIs and boost patient care. For instance, Ahmadipour et al. (2022) emphasize that poor HH practices contribute to infection transmission in healthcare settings, increasing illness, extended hospice visits, and higher costs. Alhumaid et al. (2021) verified that structured HH education plans increase compliance rates among clinical staff, resulting in fewer HAIs. Data from Douno et al. (2023) indicate that HAIs pose a significant global burden in poor nations where patient safety is a backseat to other health priorities.
Limited awareness and resource allocation contribute to higher infection rates. However, HAIs can be reduced by up to 55% with proper HH by healthcare workers. The healthcare workforce faces challenges like inconsistent HH practices due to knowledge gaps and workflow disruptions. Introducing an organized HH education program tailored for healthcare providers safeguards standardized practices, reduces infection risks, and enhances care quality.
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)
Studies indicate targeted HH education programs help lower HAIs and protect patients. According to Chakma et al. (2024), not properly cleaning hands can cause HAIs for patients, staff, and visitors, which raises the risk of death, increased hospital stays, and greater healthcare spending. Across the globe, 7% of patients in wealthy nations and 15% in less wealthy ones get HAIs while in the hospital, with around 1 in 10 of them dying from the infection. According to McDonald et al. (2020), real-time monitoring and feedback improved how healthcare workers followed protocols and led to fewer infections.
Islam et al. (2021) pointed out that appointing infection control champions and using a planned training program helps to improve HH and ensure the team follows the guidelines promptly. This way of working supports the plan’s aim to raise HH obedience in healthcare settings by educating and supervising staff. A study has shown that following common HH guidelines encourages staff to participate and helps reduce inefficient work (van Roekel et al., 2021). It is clear from evidence that when individuals are given personalized care and staff communicate well, errors are reduced, infection does not spread and staff experience less burnout. The results highlight why structured educational strategies are needed to safeguard proper infection control and reduce the costs of hospitals in high-risk areas (Assadian et al., 2021).
Evaluation and Synthesis of Relevant Health Policy
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) emphasizes improving patient safety and quality of care, supporting initiatives like enhancing HH among Benedictine Healthcare staff. By promoting standards that reduce HAIs and encourage preventive practices, the ACA provides a strong policy foundation for this project. The act’s focus on evidence-based interventions and quality improvement aligns with increasing HH compliance to protect patients and staff. The ACA incentivizes healthcare organizations to adopt safety protocols and improve infection control measures through value-based reimbursement models (Shittu et al., 2020). Executing structured HH programs at Benedictine Healthcare reflects these priorities by aiming to reduce infection rates, improve patient outcomes, and meet regulatory and accreditation standards.
Advancements in healthcare expertise like automated supervising arrangements, real-time compliance dashboards, and integrated EHR alerts support the proposed intervention to enhance HH among staff at Benedictine Healthcare. These tools can track HH compliance, issue reminders, and generate reports that help monitor adherence and identify patterns of noncompliance.
Automated systems and badge-based monitoring solutions offer real-time feedback. It encourages accountability and behavioral change (Alhusain, 2025). However, challenges remain in adopting these technologies, including limited funding, staff resistance, and training needs. Effective communication and staff education with culturally sensitive materials are critical for building awareness and fostering a culture of infection prevention. Addressing infrastructure gaps, evaluating cost-effectiveness, and preparing staff for technology adoption will be a justifiable approach for decreasing HAIs and improving patient safety through improved HH practices.
Conclusion
Implementing structured HH education at Benedictine Healthcare is a crucial step toward reducing HAIs and promoting patient safety. By introducing targeted training, visual cues, and compliance monitoring over four weeks, this project addresses existing staff awareness and practice gaps. The HH improvement initiative fosters continuous improvement and a culture of accountability. HH compliance strengthens patient protection, enhances care quality, and improves operational efficiency across the facility.
References
Adams, F., Zimmerman, P.-A., Sparke, V. L., & Mason, M. (2023). Towards a framework for a collaborative support model to assist infection prevention and control programmes in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. International Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v19.21851
Ahmadipour, M., Dehghan, M., Ahmadinejad, M., Jabarpour, M., & Shahrbabaki, P. (2022). Barriers to hand hygiene compliance in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.968231
Alhumaid, S., Al Mutair, A., Al Alawi, Z., Alsuliman, M., Ahmed, G. Y., Rabaan, A. A., Al-Tawfiq, J. A., & Al-Omari, A. (2021). Knowledge of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers and factors influencing compliance: A systematic review. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00957-0
Alhusain, F. A. (2025). Harnessing artificial intelligence for infection control and prevention in hospitals: A comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions. Saudi Medical Journal, 46(4), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.4.20240878
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)
Assadian, O., Harbarth, S., Vos, M., Knobloch, J. K., Asensio, A., & Widmer, A. F. (2021). Practical recommendations for routine cleaning and disinfection procedures in healthcare institutions: A narrative review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.03.010
Assefa, D., Melaku, T., Bayisa, B., & Alemu, S. (2021). Knowledge, attitude and self-reported performance and challenges of hand hygiene using alcohol-based hand sanitizers among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study. Infection and Drug Resistance, Volume 14, 303–313. https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s291690
Blomgren, P.-O. ., Lytsy, B., Hjelm, K., & Swenne, C. L. (2021). Healthcare workers’ perceptions and acceptance of an electronic reminder system for hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection, 108, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.005
Chakma, S. K., Hossen, S., Rakib, T. M., Hoque, S., Islam, R., Biswas, T., Islam, Z., & Islam, M. M. (2024). Effectiveness of a hand hygiene training intervention in improving knowledge and compliance rate among healthcare workers in a respiratory disease hospital. Heliyon, 10(5), e27286–e27286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27286
Deryabina, A., Lyman, M., Yee, D., Gelieshvilli, M., Sanodze, L., Madzgarashvili, L., Weiss, J., Kilpatrick, C., Rabkin, M., Skaggs, B., & Kolwaite, A. (2021). Core components of infection prevention and control programs at the facility level in Georgia: key challenges and opportunities. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00879-3
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 2 Problem Statement (PICOT)
Douno, M., Rocha, C., Borchert, M., Nabe, I., & Müller, S. A. (2023). Qualitative assessment of hand hygiene knowledge, attitudes and practices among healthcare workers prior to the implementation of the WHO Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy at Faranah Regional Hospital, Guinea. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(2), e0001581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001581
Islam, M., Chung, J., Sultana, S., Unicomb, L., Alam, M., Rahman, M., Ercumen, A., & Luby, S. P. (2021). Effectiveness of mass media campaigns to improve handwashing-related behavior, knowledge, and practices in rural Bangladesh. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 104(4). https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1154
Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Gupta, A. K., Kishore, S., Kumar, M., Ahmar, R., Prakash, J., & Sharan, S. (2022). Improvement of hand hygiene compliance using the Plan-Do-Study-Act method: Quality improvement project from a tertiary care institute in Bihar, India. Cureus, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25590
Lowe, H., Woodd, S., Lange, I. L., Janjanin, S., Barnett, J., & Graham, W. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for infection prevention and control in hospitals in conflict-affected settings: A qualitative study. Conflict and Health, 15(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00428-8
McDonald, M. V., Brickner, C., Russell, D., Dowding, D., Larson, E. L., Trifilio, M., Bick, I. Y., Sridharan, S., Song, J., Adams, V., Woo, K., & Shang, J. (2020). Observation of hand hygiene practices in home health care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.031
Shittu, A., Hannon, E., Kyriacou, J., Arnold, D., Kitz, M., Zhang, Z., Chan, C., & Kohli-Seth, R. (2020). Improving care for critical care patients by strategic alignment of quality goals with a physician financial incentive model. Quality Management in Health Care, 30(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000281
van Roekel, H., Reinhard, J., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2021). Improving hand hygiene in hospitals: Comparing the effect of a nudge and a boost on protocol compliance. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.15
WHO. (2021). Key facts and figures. WHO. https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-hand-hygiene-day/2021/key-facts-and-figures