NURS FPX 4015 Assessments

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 6107 Curriculum Design, Development, and Evaluation

Prof. Name

Date

Curriculum Evaluation

Curriculum evaluation is a systematic process used to determine whether educational programs align with intended learning outcomes and professional standards. In nursing education, this process is essential for maintaining academic rigor and ensuring graduates are prepared for complex clinical environments (Epp et al., 2021). The Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program at Capella University (CU) is designed to prepare nurses for advanced healthcare settings by strengthening clinical reasoning, leadership, and evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies.

The purpose of this evaluation is to critically appraise the CU BSN curriculum using standards established by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (AACN, 2020). The analysis focuses on curriculum quality, alignment with professional expectations, and areas requiring improvement. Findings are intended to support continuous curriculum refinement and ensure graduates meet healthcare workforce demands.

Curriculum Overview, Framework, and Learner Analysis

Evaluation of Nursing Curriculum and Target Learners

The CU BSN program primarily serves registered nurses who already hold an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) and seek academic and professional advancement. The curriculum is structured to enhance clinical judgment, leadership capacity, and population health competencies required in contemporary healthcare environments (CU, 2024, a).

The program’s online delivery model is particularly suited for working professionals, enabling flexible progression while maintaining employment. Accreditation alignment with CCNE ensures that the curriculum adheres to nationally recognized nursing education standards (CU, 2024). The program also reflects institutional values emphasizing innovation, academic excellence, and professional development.

Key learner characteristics include:

  • Licensed registered nurses (RNs)
  • ADN-prepared students transitioning to BSN
  • Working professionals in clinical practice

Mission Statement and Course Structure

The CU BSN curriculum is designed to strengthen nursing practice through advanced knowledge acquisition and applied clinical competencies. Its mission emphasizes preparation of nurses capable of functioning effectively in dynamic healthcare environments while integrating EBP, ethics, and cultural competence (CU, 2024).

The program includes eight core courses totaling 180 quarterly credits (CU, 2024, b). While the curriculum provides foundational and advanced knowledge, literature suggests that increased integration of experiential learning could further strengthen practice readiness (Spencer et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2024).

Selected Core Courses Overview

Course TitlePrimary FocusKey Competency Developed
Practicing in the Community to Improve Population HealthPopulation health and social determinantsHealth equity and community intervention
Leading People, Processes, and OrganizationsLeadership in healthcare systemsInterprofessional leadership
Ethics in Health CareEthical decision-makingMoral reasoning and patient rights
Evidence-Based Decision-Making (EBDM)EBP integrationClinical decision-making

Integration of Professional Standards and Competencies

The CU BSN program aligns with multiple professional frameworks, including AACN Essentials, ANA standards, and CCNE accreditation requirements. These frameworks ensure that graduates develop competencies necessary for safe and effective nursing practice (Brunt & Russell, 2022).

Courses emphasize evidence-based clinical reasoning, interprofessional collaboration, and ethical decision-making. For example, the EBDM course reinforces the use of empirical evidence in patient care decisions (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). Additionally, leadership-focused courses support teamwork and systems-based practice in alignment with ACEN standards (Ellison et al., 2024).

The curriculum also prepares students for the NCLEX-RN examination, reinforcing its alignment with professional licensure expectations (Sartain et al., 2023).

Student Learning Outcomes

The BSN program outcomes are aligned with AACN competency domains and emphasize safe, ethical, and effective nursing practice. Expected outcomes include:

  • Delivery of safe, evidence-based nursing care
  • Application of EBP in clinical decision-making
  • Engagement in lifelong professional development
  • Demonstration of interprofessional collaboration skills

These outcomes align with national nursing education expectations and reflect current workforce needs (Beede et al., 2023; Bally et al., 2022).

Curriculum Framework and Theoretical Foundation

The CU BSN curriculum is grounded in concept-based learning and competency-based education models. It incorporates AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice (EBEPNP), ensuring alignment with national academic standards.

This framework supports critical thinking by organizing content around core nursing concepts rather than isolated tasks. Competency-based progression allows learners to demonstrate mastery before advancing (CU, 2024, b).

The concept-based model encourages clinical reasoning and application of theoretical knowledge in practice environments (Dorri et al., 2024).

Major Nursing Concepts and Application in Practice

The curriculum integrates the nursing process—assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation—across multiple courses.

  • Assessment: Data-driven patient evaluation using EBP principles (Bourgault et al., 2024)
  • Diagnosis: Interpretation of clinical data to identify patient problems
  • Planning: Development of individualized care plans
  • Implementation: Application of care strategies through simulation and clinical practice
  • Evaluation: Outcome measurement and care adjustment

This structured integration ensures consistency between theoretical instruction and clinical application.

Curriculum Design and Proposed Course Addition

Introduction of Health Informatics in Nursing Practice

A proposed addition to the curriculum is the course “Health Informatics in Nursing Practice.” This course is designed to strengthen digital competency and improve the integration of technology into nursing care delivery.

Its inclusion responds to the growing demand for informatics skills in modern healthcare systems, including electronic health records (EHRs), telehealth platforms, and clinical decision-support systems (Harerimana et al., 2021).

Course Relevance and Rationale

Healthcare systems increasingly rely on digital infrastructure, requiring nurses to be proficient in data management and informatics tools (Ali et al., 2022). This course addresses skill gaps in:

  • EHR utilization
  • Data analytics in nursing practice
  • Telehealth communication systems
  • Digital patient safety and privacy compliance

It also supports interprofessional collaboration and aligns with AACN expectations for technology-integrated nursing education (Okolo et al., 2024).

Topical Structure and Curriculum Alignment

Topic AreaDescriptionCurriculum Linkage
Introduction to Health InformaticsFoundational concepts and applicationsEBP and nursing theory courses
Data Safety and ManagementPrivacy, security, HIPAA complianceEthics in Healthcare
Electronic Health Records (EHR)Digital documentation systemsClinical practice courses
Telehealth and Patient ManagementRemote care delivery systemsCommunity health and assessment
Interdisciplinary CommunicationTeam-based digital coordinationLeadership and collaboration courses

Internal and External Curriculum Influences

Curriculum development is influenced by both internal and external factors.

Internal factors include:

  • Institutional funding and resource allocation
  • Curriculum committee approvals
  • Faculty expertise and academic governance

External factors include:

  • Accreditation requirements (CCNE, AACN)
  • Healthcare policy and regulatory standards
  • Technological advancements in healthcare delivery
  • Stakeholder expectations (Leochico, 2022; Eckhoff et al., 2022)

Importance of Curriculum Evaluation

Regular curriculum evaluation ensures academic relevance, accreditation compliance, and workforce readiness. It supports continuous improvement by identifying gaps in content delivery and learner preparedness (Belita et al., 2020).

Evaluation benefits include:

  • Improved student learning outcomes
  • Enhanced faculty teaching effectiveness
  • Stronger alignment with healthcare industry needs
  • Sustained accreditation compliance

Failure to evaluate curricula may result in outdated content and reduced graduate competency in modern healthcare environments (Gaughan et al., 2022).

Pilot Testing and Curriculum Improvement

Pilot testing is a structured method used to evaluate new curriculum components before full implementation. It identifies challenges, improves instructional design, and enhances learner outcomes (Pearson et al., 2020).

A successful example includes simulation-based EHR training, which improved student confidence and informatics competency after iterative refinement based on feedback (Kleib et al., 2021).

Short-Term and Long-Term Evaluation Strategies

Short-term evaluation focuses on immediate course effectiveness through surveys and assessments, while long-term evaluation examines graduate performance and professional outcomes (Guardado & Light, 2020).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Evaluation TypeFocusTimingMethod
Short-termCourse effectivenessImmediately after course completionSurveys, quizzes
Long-termCareer readiness3–5 years post-graduationEmployment tracking, alumni feedback

Evidence-Based Curriculum Development

Integrating EBP into curriculum design ensures alignment with current clinical standards. Simulation-based learning, interactive teaching methods, and theory-driven instruction enhance student engagement and clinical competence (Spencer, 2021).

The incorporation of nursing theories such as the Health Promotion Model strengthens conceptual understanding and supports holistic patient care delivery.

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

The CU BSN program is accredited by CCNE, ensuring compliance with national standards for nursing education (CU, 2024, c). Accreditation evaluates:

  • Curriculum quality and relevance
  • Faculty qualifications
  • Student support services
  • Program outcomes and licensure success rates

Continuous improvement is required to maintain accreditation status and ensure ongoing program quality (McCormick & Sinutko, 2024).

Conclusion

The CU BSN curriculum demonstrates strong alignment with national nursing education standards, particularly in EBP integration, leadership development, and foundational clinical competencies. However, enhanced incorporation of health informatics and experiential learning is necessary to strengthen graduate readiness for technology-driven healthcare environments. Continuous curriculum evaluation, stakeholder engagement, and evidence-based revisions remain essential for maintaining program quality and accreditation compliance.

References

AACN. (2020). American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) > Home. Aacnnursing.org. https://www.aacnnursing.org/ 

Ahmad, I., Asghar, Z., Kumar, T., Li, G., Manzoor, A., Mikhaylov, K., & Harjula, E. (2022). Emerging technologies for next generation remote health care and assisted living. Ieee Access10, 56094-56132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177278

Alawi, A. R., & Alexander, G. L. (2020). Systematic review of program evaluation in baccalaureate nursing programs. Journal of Professional Nursing36(4), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.12.003

Ali, S., Kleib, M., Paul, P., Petrovskaya, O., & Kennedy, M. (2022). Compassionate nursing care and the use of digital health technologies: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies127, 104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104161

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Alsayed, A. R., Hasoun, L., Khader, H. A., Al-Dulaimi, A., AbuAwad, A., Basheti, I., & Al Maqbali, M. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of educational medical informatics tutorial on improving pharmacy students’ knowledge and skills about the clinical problem-solving process. Pharmacy Practice20(2), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2022.2.2652 

Bally, J. M., Spurr, S., Hyslop, S., Hodgson-Viden, H., & McNair, E. D. (2022). Using an interprofessional competency framework to enhance collaborative pediatric nursing education and practice. BioMed Central Nursing21(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00932-z

Bayley, K. E. (2023). The impact on practice of authentic assessment as part of a university postgraduate taught programme of study for nursing and healthcare professionals: A literature review. Nurse Education Today120, 105622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105622

Beede, W. E., Sharpnack, P., Gruben, D., Klenke-Borgmann, L., Goliat, L., & Yeager, C. (2023). A scoping review of nurse educator competencies: Mind the gap. Nurse Educator48(5), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001376

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Belita, E., Carter, N., & Bryant-Lukosius, D. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in nursing curriculum development and renewal initiatives: A review of the literature. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education-Avancées en Formation Infirmière6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1200

Bourgault, A. M., Penoyer, D., & Conner, N. E. (2024). Teaching evidence-based practice competencies to meet professional practice needs. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 10-1097. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000781

Brunt, B. A., & Russell, J. (2022). Nursing professional development standards. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534784/

Camison, L., Brooker, J. E., Naran, S., Potts III, J. R., & Losee, J. E. (2022). The history of surgical education in the United States: Past, present, and future. Annals of Surgery Open3(1), e148. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000148

CDC. (n.d.). Chapter 7: Evaluation Phases and Processes | Principles of Community Engagement. Cdc.gov. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_program_phases.html

  1. (2024, a). Bachelor of Science in Nursing BSN degree program online. capella.edu. https://www.capella.edu/online-nursing-degrees/bachelors-rn-to-bsn-completion/courses/
  2. (2024, b). RN to BSN | Online bachelor’s degree. capella.edu. https://www.capella.edu/online-nursing-degrees/bachelors-rn-to-bsn-completion/
  3. (2024, c). University Accreditations. capella.edu. https://www.capella.edu/capella-experience/about/university-accreditation/

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Davis, S. M., Jones, A., Jaynes, M. E., Woodrum, K. N., Canaday, M., Allen, L., & Mallow, J. A. (2020). Designing a multifaceted telehealth intervention for a rural population using a model for developing complex interventions in nursing. BioMed Central Nursing19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0400-9

Dorri, R., Al Omari, E., Blanco, M., & Al-Hassan, M. (2024). Transforming nursing pedagogy: The journey to concept-based learning at the University of Calgary in Qatar. Saudi Journal of Nursing Health Care7(1), 3-6. http://doi.org/10.36348/sjnhc.2024.v07i01.002

Eckhoff, D. O., Guido-Sanz, F., & Anderson, M. (2022). Telehealth across nursing education: Findings from a national study. Journal of Professional Nursing42, 308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.013

Ellison, N. K., Tillson, M., Farmer, S., Ard, N., & Polk, L. (2024). The ACEN 2023 standards and impact of accreditation on the quality of nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing19(2), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.12.016

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Epp, S., Reekie, M., Denison, J., de Bosch Kemper, N., Willson, M., & Marck, P. (2021). Radical transformation: Embracing constructivism and pedagogy for an innovative nursing curriculum. Journal of Professional Nursing37(5), 804-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.007

Farayola, O. A., Olorunfemi, O. L., & Shoetan, P. O. (2024). Data privacy and security in it: A review of techniques and challenges. Computer Science & IT Research Journal5(3), 606-615. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.909

Gaughan, M. R., Kwon, M., Park, E., & Jungquist, C. (2022). Nurses’ experience and perception of technology use in practice: A qualitative study using an extended technology acceptance model. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing40(7), 478-486. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000850 

Gonzalez, L., & Nielsen, A. (2023). An integrative review of teaching strategies to support clinical judgment development in clinical education for nurses. Nurse Education Today, 106047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106047

Guardado, M., & Light, J. (2020). Evaluating the plan and lived experience of the curriculum: Completing the circle. Springer EBooks, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-

47468-3_6

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Harerimana, A., Wicking, K., Biedermann, N., & Yates, K. (2021). Integrating nursing informatics into undergraduate nursing education in Africa: A scoping review. International Nursing Review68(3), 420-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12618

Harris, C. K. E., Durham, C., Logan, A., Smith, G., & DuBose-Morris, R. (2021). Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: A review. Telemedicine and e-Health27(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0261

Kawamoto, K., Kukhareva, P. V., Weir, C., Flynn, M. C., Nanjo, C. J., Martin, D. K., & Del Fiol, G. (2021). Establishing a multidisciplinary initiative for interoperable electronic health record innovations at an academic medical center. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Open4(3), ooab041. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab041

Kleib, M., Jackman, D., Duarte Wisnesky, U., & Ali, S. (2021). Academic electronic health records in undergraduate nursing education: Mixed methods pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research Nursing4(2), e26944. https://doi.org/10.2196/26944

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing20(158), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2 

Labrague, L. J. (2021). Use of simulation in teaching nursing leadership and management course: an integrative review. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal21(3), 344. https://doi.org/10.18295%2Fsqumj.4.2021.007

Leochico, C. F. D. (2022). Educating health care professionals about telerehabilitation: Developing a curriculum map for high-and low-resource settings. In Telerehabilitation, 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-82486-6.00027-7  

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Liu, C. C., McIntire, E., Ling, J., Sullivan, K., Ng, T., Kaur, L., & Sender, J. (2024). Teaching social determinants of health in nursing programs: An integrative review of strategies and effectiveness. Nurse Educator49(3), E126-E130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001543

McCormick, M., & Sinutko, J. (2024). Building the blueprint: Developing new prelicensure nursing programs. Medical Research Archives12(4). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i4.5324

Nazeha, N., Pavagadhi, D., Kyaw, B. M., Car, J., Jimenez, G., & Tudor Car, L. (2020). A digitally competent health workforce: Scoping review of educational frameworks. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(11), e22706. https://doi.org/10.2196/22706

Okolo, C. A., Ijeh, S., Arowoogun, J. O., Adeniyi, A. O., & Omotayo, O. (2024). Reviewing the impact of health information technology on healthcare management efficiency. International Medical Science Research Journal4(4), 420-440. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i4.1000

Pearson, N., Naylor, P.-J., Ashe, M. C., Fernandez, M., Yoong, S. L., & Wolfenden, L. (2020). 

Guidance for conducting feasibility and pilot studies for implementation trials. Pilot and Feasibility Studies6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00634-w 

 Poitras, M.-E., Couturier, Y., Beaupré, P., Girard, A., Aubry, F., Vaillancourt, V. T., Carrier, J.-D., Fortin, L., Racine, J., Morneau, J., Boudreault, A., Cormier, C., Morin, A., & McGraw, M. (2023). Collaborative practice competencies needed for telehealth delivery by health and social care professionals: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2023.2213712

Sartain, A. F. (2023). Quizzing in baccalaureate nursing education and the impact on National Council Licensure Examination for registered nurses success. Journal of Modern Nursing Practice and Research3(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.53964/jmnpr.2023019

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Smart, D., Ross, K., Carollo, S., & Williams-Gilbert, W. (2020). Contextualizing instructional technology to the demands of nursing education. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing38(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000565

Spencer, J. A. (2021). Integrating service learning into the RN to BSN curriculum with the application of QSEN competencies. Journal of Professional Nursing37(6), 1044-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.08.007

Ting, J., Garnett, A., & Donelle, L. (2021). Nursing education and training on electronic health record systems: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice55, 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103168

Yogesh, M. J., & Karthikeyan, J. (2022). Health informatics: Engaging modern healthcare units: A brief overview. Frontiers in public health10, 854688. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.854688