Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6105 Teaching and Active Learning Strategies
Prof. Name
Date
Overview of the Course
This assessment presents a structured overview of a diabetes self-management education (DSME) course designed specifically for older adults with diabetes. The primary focus is to develop, implement, and evaluate an instructional plan that enhances patients’ ability to manage their condition effectively in daily life. The instructional design is grounded in Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), which supports learning through observation, modeling, and guided practice, particularly when educators demonstrate desired health behaviors (Muhajirah, 2020).
The course design also considers the heterogeneity of the target population, including differences in culture, education level, digital literacy, and health beliefs. As a result, instructional strategies are adapted to ensure inclusivity and accessibility. Additionally, mechanisms for conflict resolution and learner engagement are incorporated to maintain a productive learning environment. The evaluation component of the course emphasizes continuous monitoring through structured assessment tools to determine whether learners achieve intended self-management competencies.
Application of Social Cognitive Theory
SCT is applied as the foundational learning framework for DSME. The theory emphasizes that individuals acquire behaviors by observing others, internalizing modeled actions, and reproducing them within their own context. It also highlights the importance of reinforcement, motivation, and reciprocal interaction between personal, behavioral, and environmental factors (Govindaraju, 2021).
In diabetes education, SCT is particularly relevant because patients benefit from observing clinicians and peers demonstrating self-care practices such as glucose monitoring, dietary control, and medication adherence. This observational structure strengthens self-efficacy and supports sustained behavioral change (Schunk & DiBenedetto, 2020).
SCT Application Mapping in DSME
| SCT Component | Educational Application in Diabetes Care | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Observational learning | Nurse demonstrates glucose monitoring and insulin use | Improved procedural accuracy |
| Modeling | Peer-led diabetes success stories | Increased motivation |
| Reinforcement | Feedback during telehealth sessions | Sustained adherence |
| Self-efficacy | Guided practice with glucometer | Confidence in self-care |
Rationale for SCT in Diabetes Education
SCT supports diabetes management because it translates abstract clinical instructions into observable and repeatable behaviors. Nurse educators serve as role models, reinforcing appropriate dietary habits, medication adherence, and glucose monitoring routines. Community-based peer learning further enhances motivation by demonstrating successful real-world disease control (Smith et al., 2019).
Stepwise demonstrations, combined with visual aids and educational materials, help older adults retain complex information. This structured modeling approach strengthens cognitive processing and improves long-term behavioral adoption (Ghoreishi et al., 2019).
Explanation of Learner Outcomes
The DSME course is designed to achieve measurable cognitive, psychomotor, and behavioral outcomes.
| Domain | Learner Outcome | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive | Understand diabetes pathophysiology, HbA1c, and insulin function | Quizzes and verbal assessments |
| Psychomotor | Perform blood glucose monitoring correctly | Practical demonstration |
| Behavioral | Adopt lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, medication adherence) | Self-reporting logs and follow-ups |
| Interprofessional awareness | Understand role of care team in diabetes management | Group discussions |
Through interdisciplinary engagement with dietitians, physicians, and nurses, patients develop a holistic understanding of disease management (Williams et al., 2022).
Implementation of Learning Methods and Techniques
The teaching strategy emphasizes observational learning, cultural responsiveness, and interactive engagement. Given the diversity of learners, instructional methods are adapted to accommodate varying literacy levels and cultural dietary practices.
Key instructional techniques include:
- Video demonstrations of self-care procedures
- Interactive telehealth workshops
- Visual aids and printed guides
- Group discussions and peer learning
- One-on-one coaching sessions
These approaches ensure that learners with different preferences (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) can engage effectively (Liu et al., 2022).
Integration of Learning Strategies and Telehealth Approach
Telehealth is adopted as the primary delivery method for DSME due to accessibility constraints among older adults. It allows patients to receive continuous education without physical travel, which is particularly beneficial for those with mobility limitations or residing in remote areas (Kaveh et al., 2021).
| Strategy | Description | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Telehealth platforms | Remote consultations via apps/portals | Accessibility and continuity |
| Educational videos | Demonstration-based learning | Improved comprehension |
| Virtual group sessions | Peer discussion forums | Social support |
| Mobile health apps | Medication and glucose tracking | Behavioral consistency |
This approach assumes that home-based learning reduces stress and improves adherence by eliminating logistical barriers such as transportation and fatigue.
Assumptions for Instructional Design
The instructional design is based on several assumptions:
- Older adults benefit from flexible, home-based learning environments
- Digital tools can enhance, rather than hinder, learning when properly supported
- Emotional and cognitive load decreases when education is delivered remotely
- Structured guidance improves adherence in chronic disease management (Toschi & Munshi, 2020)
Classroom Management Strategy (Kounin’s Theory)
Kounin’s classroom management framework emphasizes structured instruction, smooth transitions, and proactive engagement to reduce disruptions and improve learning efficiency (Walker & Barry, 2020).
| Principle | Application in DSME | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Withitness | Continuous monitoring during sessions | Reduced misunderstandings |
| Overlapping | Managing multiple learner queries | Efficient time use |
| Smooth transitions | Structured session flow | Improved engagement |
| Engagement variety | Quizzes and interactive tasks | Sustained attention |
Learner Management Strategy (Vygotsky’s Theory)
Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory emphasizes learning through social interaction and guided support within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) (Taber, 2020).
| Concept | Application | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| ZPD | Nurse-guided skill practice | Skill acquisition support |
| Scaffolding | Step-by-step instruction | Progressive independence |
| Social interaction | Peer group learning | Shared knowledge development |
Although effective, limitations exist in defining exact learner capability boundaries, which may introduce subjectivity in assessment (Bulle, 2021).
Conflicting Perspectives
- Critics argue that Kounin’s theory lacks strong empirical validation and overemphasizes teacher behavior while underrepresenting learner variability (Walker & Barry, 2020).
- Vygotsky’s framework is criticized for its subjective interpretation of the ZPD and difficulty in standardizing learner readiness levels (Bulle, 2021).
Evidence-Based Strategies to Enhance Motivation
- Application of self-determination theory to enhance autonomy in self-care decisions (Phillips & Guarnaccia, 2020)
- Culturally responsive teaching to improve engagement and respect for diversity (Sinclair et al., 2020)
- Use of mobile applications for medication reminders and glucose tracking to reinforce consistency (Kusnanto et al., 2019)
Barriers to Learning
| Barrier | Description | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Digital literacy limitations | Difficulty using telehealth tools | Training sessions and guided support |
| Cultural differences | Dietary and belief variations | Culturally tailored content |
| Cognitive decline | Age-related memory issues | Repetition and visual aids |
| Low motivation | Chronic disease fatigue | Peer support and reinforcement |
Health literacy-focused communication is applied to simplify medical terminology and improve comprehension (Kim et al., 2019).
Assessment Strategies
| Method | Description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Telehealth engagement tracking | Monitoring login and participation | Measure engagement |
| Blood glucose logs | Patient-recorded readings | Evaluate behavioral change |
| Quizzes and polls | Short knowledge checks | Assess understanding |
| Reflective discussions | Patient feedback sessions | Identify learning gaps |
Evaluation of Learning Outcomes
Both formative and summative assessments are used to measure DSME effectiveness.
| Type | Description | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Formative | Continuous feedback during sessions | Ongoing |
| Summative | Final evaluation (exam/viva) | End of course |
Improved test performance and consistent self-monitoring behaviors indicate successful learning outcomes (Powers et al., 2020).
Integration of Cultural Competence
Cultural competence is essential due to the diverse backgrounds of learners. Cultural beliefs significantly influence dietary habits, treatment adherence, and health perceptions (Lin & Hsu, 2020).
The course integrates culturally responsive education by:
- Respecting dietary traditions while modifying unhealthy components
- Using inclusive language and interpreters when needed
- Designing patient-centered care plans aligned with cultural values (Oikarainen et al., 2019)
Summary
This DSME course design integrates Social Cognitive Theory as the primary instructional foundation, supported by telehealth delivery and evidence-based teaching strategies. The program emphasizes observational learning, cultural competence, and learner-centered engagement. Classroom and learner management frameworks (Kounin and Vygotsky) enhance instructional structure and social learning. Assessment strategies ensure continuous evaluation of patient progress, while motivation and barrier-reduction strategies improve adherence and long-term self-management outcomes.
References
Abimbola, S., Keelan, S., Everett, M., Casburn, K., Mitchell, M., Burchfield, K., & Martiniuk, A. (2019). The medium, the message and the measure: A theory-driven review on the value of telehealth as a patient-facing digital health innovation. Health Economics Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0239-5
Adu, M. D., Malabu, U. H., Malau-Aduli, A. E. O., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2019). Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation. PLOS ONE, 14(6), e0217771. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550406/
Banerjee, M., Chakraborty, S., & Pal, R. (2020). Diabetes self-management amid COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(4), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.013
Bulle, N. (2021). Vygotsky versus dewey on mental causation: The core of two divergent conceptions of human thought. New Ideas in Psychology, 63, 100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100898
NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan
Fabris, C., & Kovatchev, B. (2019). Glucose monitoring devices: Measuring blood glucose to manage and control diabetes. Academic Press.
Ghoreishi, M.-S., Vahedian-shahroodi, M., Jafari, A., & Tehranid, H. (2019). Self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: Education intervention base on social cognitive theory. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 13(3), 2049–2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2019.04.045
Govindaraju, V. (2021). Multicultural education A review of social cognitive theory from the perspective of interpersonal communication. Multicultural Education, 7(12), 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5802235
Handtke, O., Schilgen, B., & Mösko, M. (2019). Culturally competent healthcare – A scoping review of strategies implemented in healthcare organizations and a model of culturally competent healthcare provision. PLOS ONE, 14(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219971
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., Skyler, J. S., Snoek, F. J., Weinstock, R. S., & Peters, A. L. (2021). The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. Diabetes Care, 44(11). https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0043
NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan
Johnsen, H. M., Briseid, H. S., Brodtkorb, K., Slettebø, Å., & Fossum, M. (2021). Nursing students’ perceptions of combining hands-on simulation with simulated patients and a serious game in preparing for clinical placement in home healthcare: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104675
Kaveh, M. H., Faradonbeh, M. R., & Kaveh, S. (2021). Telehealth impact on biomedical, psychosocial, and behavioural outcomes in patients with diabetes older than 50 years: A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1357633X2110522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633×211052222
Kim, S. H., & Utz, S. (2019). Effectiveness of a social media–based, health literacy–sensitive diabetes self‐management intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12521
Kim, S., Song, Y., Park, J., & Utz, S. (2019). Patients’ experiences of diabetes self-management education according to health-literacy levels. Clinical Nursing Research, 29(5), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773819865879
Kusnanto, Widyanata, K. A. J., Suprajitno, & Arifin, H. (2019). DM-calendar app as a diabetes self-management education on adult type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00468-1
NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan
Lee, S.-K., Shin, D.-H., Kim, Y.-H., & Lee, K.-S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323
Lin, M.-H., & Hsu, H.-C. (2020). Effects of a cultural competence education programme on clinical nurses: A randomised controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 88, 104385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104385
Liu, J. T., Breidenthal, A. P., & Schaffer, B. (2022). Let’s all go to the movies, together: A social cognitive perspective on diversity, equity, and inclusion in management education video clips. Management Teaching Review, 8(4), 237929812211400. https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981221140057
Muhajirah, M. (2020). Basic of learning theory: (Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism). International Journal of Asian Education (IJAE) by READ Institute, 1(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i1.23
Oikarainen, A., Mikkonen, K., Kenny, A., Tomietto, M., Tuomikoski, A.-M., Meriläinen, M., Miettunen, J., & Kääriäinen, M. (2019). Educational interventions designed to develop nurses’ cultural competence: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 98(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.005
Phillips, A. S., & Guarnaccia, C. A. (2020). Self-determination theory and motivational interviewing interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(1), 135910531773760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317737606
Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J. K., Cypress, M., Funnell, M. M., Harms, D., Hess-Fischl, A., Hooks, B., Isaacs, D., Mandel, E. D., Maryniuk, M. D., Norton, A., Rinker, J., Siminerio, L. M., & Uelmen, S. (2020). Diabetes self-management education and support in adults with type 2 diabetes: A consensus report. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 60(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.04.018
NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan
Saxby, N., Beggs, S., Battersby, M., & Lawn, S. (2019). What are the components of effective chronic condition self-management education interventions for children with asthma, cystic fibrosis, and diabetes? Patient Education and Counseling, 102(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.001
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Shahin, W., Kennedy, G. A., & Stupans, I. (2019). The impact of personal and cultural beliefs on medication adherence of patients with chronic illnesses: A systematic review. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13(1), 1019–1035. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s212046
Sinclair, A., & Abdelhafiz, A. (2020). Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2020.04.002
Sinclair, K. A., Zamora-Kapoor, A., Townsend-Ing, C., McElfish, P. A., & Kaholokula, J. K. (2020). Implementation outcomes of a culturally adapted diabetes self-management education intervention for native Hawaiians and pacific islanders. BMC Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09690-6
Smith, Y., Garcia-Torres, R., Coughlin, S., Ling, J., Marin, T., Su, S., & Young, L. (2019). The effectiveness of social cognitive theory-based interventions on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JMIR Research Protocols, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/17148
NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan
Świątoniowska, N., Sarzyńska, K., Szymańska-Chabowska, A., & Jankowska-Polańska, B. (2019). The role of education in type 2 diabetes treatment. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 151(151), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.004
Taber, K. S. (2020). Mediated learning leading development—the social development theory of Lev Vygotsky. Springer Texts in Education, 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_19
Thojampa, S. (2019). The social cognitive theory with diabetes: Discussion. International Journal of Caring, 12, 2. https://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/76_1-thojampa_special_12_2.pdf
Toschi, E., & Munshi, M. N. (2020). Benefits and challenges of diabetes technology use in older adults. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 49(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2019.10.001
Walker, J. D., & Barry, C. (2020). Behavior management: Systems, classrooms, and individuals. Plural Publishing.
Williams, D. M., Jones, H., & Stephens, J. W. (2022). Personalized type 2 diabetes management: An update on recent advances and recommendations. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 15(1), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s331654
Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2019, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131